When it comes to end-of-life care and relief that can lead to the death of the patient, a number of words are often used interchangeably. However, many of these terms are specific and different, and have different legality in a number of states. Former medical students often began their studies with the Hippocratic Oath urging them to renounce euthanasia. Younger doctors pronounce their vows, with the exception of the classic version, which focuses largely on the well-being of the souls they care for. Last week, after years of constant litigation and care, Tinslee was finally able to return home with her family. In contrast, religious people claim that since God gives life, only God can take it away. When people deliberately end their lives prematurely, they completely violate God`s laws and commandments. If a terminally ill patient chooses assisted suicide or euthanasia, he will be punished in the afterlife. In the United States today, assisted suicide – the voluntary interruption of life by administering a lethal substance with the direct or indirect help of a doctor – is legal in California, Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia. (Montana law does not prohibit a physician from complying with a patient`s request to hasten death.) Although several states have passed euthanasia and assisted suicide laws for terminally ill patients in recent years, both methods remain illegal in Texas. There are also various arguments for not using euthanasia in public health. Frequently cited reasons for not advocating euthanasia include: The main provisions of Texas euthanasia laws are listed in the table below, and additional background information follows. See details on state euthanasia laws for more information.
Sections 166.45-51 of the Texas Health and Safety Code state that euthanasia is not tolerated or permitted in Texas. In addition, any act or omission that contributes to a person`s death is also illegal, except that a person can die naturally without interference. Passive euthanasia occurs when a doctor refuses or interrupts life-sustaining treatment to cause the death of the patient. Voluntary passive euthanasia is no longer used. The case for euthanasia is multiple and includes a variety of opinions. Commonly cited reasons for euthanasia are as follows: Physicians` opinions are more difficult to clarify and have much smaller samples than for the general public, and therefore may not be as accurate.  Physicians surveyed were less likely to support physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia than the public. Contrary to public opinion, doctors felt more comfortable with physician-assisted suicide than with euthanasia. In other countries where both are legal, namely Belgium and the Netherlands, doctors are much more supportive with a support rate of around 85%.
 A recent review examined surveys, interviews, and death certificates from 1947 to 2016 to better understand physicians` views on physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.  In the United States, less than 20% of physicians reported that patients sought help with euthanasia or medical assistance in suicide; 5% or less reported helping patients make a request for euthanasia or medical assistance in suicide. In Oregon and Washington, where medically assisted suicide is legal, less than 1% of doctors prescribe medication for medical assistance in dying each year. In other countries, these percentages were much higher – for example, 60% of Dutch doctors prescribed drugs for medically assisted suicide; In the Netherlands and Belgium, more than half of doctors reported requests for euthanasia from patients. The study found that a large percentage of these requests were associated with cancer and were aimed at «older, white, well-educated» patients.  «Tragic end for young child prompts family to advocate for euthanasia» (Washington Post — 28. March 2014) «Natalie Newton`s family made the decision to remove her feeding tube and starve her. Newton said the ordeal had dramatized his family and was now trying to change the laws in Texas. The family is asking Texas Governor Rick Perry to legalize the option of euthanasia. In 1996, before medical assistance in dying became a priority issue, Quill testified before a subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives to defend his position on the issue.
In Houston, he explained that medically assisted suicide was legalized in Canada in 2016 because lawmakers determined that voting was a fundamental right because people live much longer. Currently, euthanasia is illegal in Massachusetts. According to Ch. 201D §12 Massachusetts states that «nothing in this chapter shall be construed as constituting, tolerating, authorizing or tolerating suicide or clemency, or permitting any positive or intentional act to end the life of a person, except to permit the natural process of death.»  Although euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are not legal in Massachusetts, the Supreme Court ruled in 1997 not to allow euthanasia or medically assisted suicide, but to give the patient the freedom to refuse life-sustaining medical care by separating these two laws.